More Pages: Newton Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40


Lots of potential, but isn't what I hoped for.
Excellent social history

Decent little book
Making Birdhouses-The Ultimate Little Bird-Lover's Handbook.

Curious collection of bizarre monstrosities
Curious and endearing

The Blood Thristy Beast
I, an almost-50 yrs. old woman, enjoyed this immensely!Just one example to illustrate Mr. Peck's prose style. Yoolee and Havilah were watching their Uncle Bib's womanfriend, named Sugar, getting onto a hammock that the Uncle had hung up between two "black mangrove trees." Sugar, her "feet up and shoes off, her chubbiness sagged a big bulge in the hammock. She filled it like a breeze to a frigate." The bulge is as big as the reader's imagination allows. However, filling the hammock "like a breeze to a frigate," that leaves no doubt as to the size of the bulge!
This is a heartwarming story inspite of some really horrid scenes described in here because Mr. Peck has skillfully weaved in some comic reliefs throughout.


Difficult to read, but interesting from a historical p.o.v.What is nice though, is that the book contains many so-called queries, which are possible explanations of various optical phenomena, explanations/assumptions Newton could not prove/disprove at the time. This is fascinating reading, because many of these turned out to be true (or false, but even then: still interesting to know what he thought).
Overall impression: if you are interested in the history of optics/Newton then it is a nice book. But just for browsing in the evening: no.
"tres curieux"

Dynamic Fashion Poses and Compositions from MagazinesThe strength of this book is Helmut Newton's outstanding fashion photography. The weakness is that it is displayed in facsimiles from the magazines rather than as a collection of perfectly reproduced photographs. This approach allows you to see how the photographs work with the layouts and designs. Also, the poses and compositions (both strengths of Newton's) are very clear for your consideration. The actual images themselves are often reproduced very poorly, however, sometimes looking like something that came off of a bad copier.
Unlike many of the great photographers of the 20th century who saw themselves as artists first, Newton saw himself as existing primarily through publications. "I realized very early on that the most important factor would be to be published, with a by-line . . . ." This made him see the artistic life of his work as secondary. "If any of these photographs end up on gallery or museum walls or in the possession of collectors, well all the better . . . ." Think of him as the exact opposite of Ansel Adams in how he wants his work to be expressed and remembered.
This book contains more than 500 pages of color, and black and white images from over 3000 that Newton published through 1998. The examples come mostly from French Vogue (beginning in 1961), Queen, Jardin des Modes, British Vogue, Elle, Daily Telegraph Magazine, American Vogue, Nova, Marie Claire, Deutsche Vogue, Amica, Vanity Fair, Paris Match, Allure, and Stern. Most of the examples are from the 1960s and the 1970s.
Mr. Newton's style is very lively. His models have strong personalities, and usually dominate the scene. They are also active, creating an excitement that draws attention to them. For example, he has a great talent for capturing models as they start to fall into a swimming pool.
In many cases, suble humor adds to the picture, as with the swimming pool props. I especially liked the photographs where Mr. Newton appears in the photograph through his use of mirrors. Equally amusing were the photographs where the models photographed themselves using mirrors in the same way.
As sexual mores and tastes loosened up over the years, Mr. Newton's work became more playful and free. I also thought it worked better. I enjoyed the brief essays in the book in which he explained how his relations with editors affected his assignments and the style limitations which he had to observe.
Seeing these images made me hunger for a similar book filled with luscious, perfectly-reproduced images of just these photographs on large pages of great paper. Hopefully, a publisher will indulge me in the future. Now that will be a more than five-star book!
After enjoying the poses and compositions, I suggest you think about where in your life you may be presenting yourself or your ideas in ways that steal much of their power. How can you ovecome that tendency?
Put your best foot forward, whenever possible.
The fabulous Helmut's work through the eyes of Vogue!

A glimpse of physics
What is new in Physics? A book that answers this question!Ch 1: I found the discussion on the Standard Model refreshingly simple, clear, accurate and current. It starts with a discussion of the discovery of the top quark in 1997 and goes on to discuss frontier topics such as exotic mesons, neurino masses etc. and it continues to discuss topis in Astrophics such as Inflation Theory (A modification of the Big Bang), dark matter, anitmatter, Antigravity, Bose-Einstein Condensates. It is remarkable that this topics can be discussed in a language that is accesible to even non physicists.
I did find minor historical issues that I question. The Book says Neutrinos were anounced by Fermi in 1930. Pauli annouced neurinos and initially called them neutrons in 1930. Fermi developed the first Weak Intercation Theory in 1934. By then,the real neutron was discovered by Chadwick in 1932. So, Fermi introduced the term neutriono (the little neutron in Italian). The Book also states the Genral Theory of Relativity was announced in 1905 by Einstein. It is common knowledge that Einstein published his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905 and the General Theory in 1916.
Ch. 3: I have no complaint but praise for any book that attempts to discuss unsolved problems in physics in a simple, non mathematical and non technical terms. Topics such as dark matter with strange acronyms such as as MACHOs, WIMPs etc. and their effects on the fate of the universe are clearly discussed. I found the discussion on the illusive Higgs Boson fascinationg. It is described as waterbug that gains mass as it swims on top of honey. The technical explanation on how Higgs Bosons gain mass requires knowledge of nonlinear quantum field theory.
Ch. 3 ends with brief discussions of String Theory and M-theory. These are highly mathematical topics that aim to unify all physics. M-theory is the latest modification of Superstring theory. [All this is dicussed in the the popular book "The Elegant Universe" By M. Green]. Ch 3 of the book in review says (correctly) that M intitailly stood for Membrane (instead of string). It aso states that some think M satnds for Mysterious, Marvelous, or even Mythical. I would like to add that some of us think M stands for Mother. i.e., M-theory is the mother of all theories.
Among the many virtues of this book(may be series) is the careful listing of relevant references to websites. Not ony does it give the URLs (www addresses) it also includes the dates when they were accesssed.


25 % of the book is not usable
Treasure trove of information and formulae

Have You Ever Wanted to Read a Book With an Election?
Come on over and read this book

very disappointed
Fun Book For Career Guidance with Young Children
I want to be.........